Figures
The original drawings are lost. The Dutch and Latin editions that Leeuwenhoek published used the same plate with both figures. The one below (click to enlarge) came from the 1730 fourth edition of Continuatio Epistolarum, as did the images on the sidebar. In the text, Leeuwenhoek noted that someone else drew the figures.
Plate from Continuatio Epistolarum |
Figures 1 and 2
|
|
Limitations of his figures
As he had in the previous letter, in this letter he mentioned the visual acuity of his draughtsman. After explaining Fig. 1, he added:
When I dissected the body of a silkworm, which was still mainly transparent, I discovered a still much greater number of small vessels or stripes.
He had trouble seeing them himself.
Here, too, I intended to have such a silkworm drawn. But no sooner had the moisture evaporated from the same, than the vessels, which one had seen so distinctly before, now were irregular, and many could not be discerned.
What ended up in Fig. 1:
The blackish vessels (so far as the draughtsman could perceive them) that lie on one side of the head of an unborn silkworm.
Leeuwenhoek recognized the problem:
My intention was, indeed, to indicate also the vessels that lie on the other side of the head. But when the draughtsman was going to draw them, I saw that he took to be vessels the cracks and fissures that had appeared in the substance due to the moisture having dried up, and therefore I stopped my intention.
In Letter 55, the problem could have been caused by the difficulty in focusing Leeuwenhoek's devices. Here, however, the problem seems to be the draughtsman. This passage makes it clear that he drew what he saw, not necessarily what Leeuwenhoek saw.
Other publications
While the Royal Society did not publish this letter in Philosophical Transactions, it was extracted twice in foreign journals, as were all the letters in Vervolg der Brieven, Letters 53 through 60. In the year after it was written, Jean Le Clerk published a long excerpt, without any figures, in Bibliothèque universelle et historique, vol. 9, pp. 301-311.
In 1689, Otto Mencke published a very short extract, again without figures, in Acta eruditorum, vol. 8, p. 172.